Triangulated Assessment
Triangulated Assessment as an evaluation method that combines multiple data sources to deliver a more holistic view of the learner's performance and understanding. It is essential; besides, it mitigates biases and, thus, increases the reliability of the assessment through the inclusion of different perspectives like self-assessment, peer review, and instructor evaluations.
Triangulated Assessment is based on three major types of data: self-assessment, peer assessment, and instructor evaluation. One case is a student who would think about their own learning (self-assessment), get comments from fellow students (peer assessment), and be judged by their teacher (instructor evaluation). This practice offers the possibility that the assessment will be comprehensive and will include the views of different people.
E-folded Assessment in your area not only helps to quantify the evaluation but also tackles the biases that may stem from the dependence on one assessment method. This is achieved through the merging of the three evaluators, namely self-assessment, peer-assessment, and instructor-assessment, to come up with a more complete view of the learner's skills. By way of example, a student who rates themselves excellent while their peers and the teacher give them some constructive criticism can learn from this difference and seek to further develop aspects of their skills or overcome the weaknesses that were unnoticed by a singular assessment method.
Triangulated Assessment is a reliable method that teachers can use in most educational settings, including K-12 classrooms, universities, and training institutes. For instance, a university class may have students submit their own personal reflections, work together in groups through peer feedback, and get formal grades from professors, thus broadening their learning experience and results through various assessment lenses.
Implementing Triangulated Assessment poses to the challenging difficulties that include the possible increased workload for both students and teachers, as well as the requirement of being trained in the way of conducting and interpreting assessments effectively. On the other hand, the main issue may be how to to ensure fair and equal treatment of different evaluators. For instance, if peer assessments have a vast range of quality it can change the overall assessment's reliability. Nevertheless, these obstacles can be overcome through adequate training and the provision of precise instructions.