Quick Fire Debates
Quick Fire Debates are fast-paced discussions that make each participant argue over a topic in a limited time frame usually and consequently, they can criticize and make decisions of people to think. These debates are necessary for communication skills, the development of spontaneity, and the acceptance of participation among people.
The time-based presentation of viewpoints, debaters should quickly respond to the opposing view, and these are all having to think quickly, and the necessity is that they must.
If teachers really want to organize Quick Fire Debates in an educational setting, first they have to select appropriate and interesting topics, then establish strict rules regarding time limits, and lastly, they should arrange participants into teams or pairs. Besides, it is good to present the subjects in terms of a framework that helps them to argue, for example, advantages and disadvantages, and also to promote reciprocal feedback after every round to improve learning outcomes.
Quick Fire Debate participants can, in turn, acquire a wide range of skills, such as critical thinking, public speaking, and the ability to catch up with ideas. As an illustration, in the process of confronting different opinions, debaters have to examine their arguments briefly and to reply to them efficiently, this is the reason their analytical and persuasive communication skills improve.
Quick Fire Debates talk about social issues, the role of technology, the environment, and moral puzzles. A couple of them are 'Should social networks undergo regulation?' and 'Is it more efficient to work at home than to work in a traditional office?' These subjects are topics our young people are concerned with and they can shed different worldly views about them through these discussions.