Bridge to High-Order Thinking
The Bridge to High-Order Thinking is a scheme to develop educational knowledge and help the students progress through a loop of learning from mere understanding then to maximum engagement, for example, analysis ,syntheses and evaluation. This is an essential step in promoting high-level critical thinking skills thus it also contributes to the development of self-reliant problem-solving skills, which are basically the main two things you really need to navigate in your day-to-day life and also in the ultra-modern tricky world.
The basic aspects of critical thinking, problem-solving, creativity, and metacognition. In this regard, these elements invite students not only to absorb data but also to think analytically, build connections, and make use of what they have learned in different contexts. To illustrate, in a science lesson, students would perhaps conduct experiments to examine hypotheses hence, they might be participating in elevated form of thinking.
This framework is tangible to the educators to be seen with their lessons, where they teach students to research, argue about their points of view, and, for their part, use actual problems in projects. Basing on that, a math teacher could offer a case of budgeting from real life that requires the application of math concepts for the students to decide how to deal with the issue creatively.
Evaluation plays a crucial role since it not only allows the educators to evaluate students' level of understanding but also their competency in engaging in higher-order thinking. Formative assessment tools, for instance, can be reflective journals or group discussions benefiting both students and teachers as they can get the insights into students' mind processes, while summative assessments are the best way to determine their capability to synthesize and evaluate the information properly. For instance, a project-based assessment that requires the students to draft a proposal on how to solve a community problem would fit in this context.
Another meaningful task is having students think critically about a historical event, like to whom the stakeholders look at possessing the authority to make decisions. They may build a presentation, explaining the event and deciding the pros and cons of the event but also adding what else could have been done if different decisions were made at the time which was not possible in reality. This requires delving deeper into the historical knowledge and analysis and synthesis of them.